From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756402Ab1LBCVZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:21:25 -0500 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com ([60.250.210.242]:58709 "EHLO rtits2.realtek.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755210Ab1LBCVY (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:21:24 -0500 X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 5.15 with qID pB22L8vG024211, This message is released by code: ctlocs8528 From: hayeswang To: "'Francois Romieu'" CC: , "'Jonathan Nieder'" , "'Eric Dumazet'" , , "'nic_swsd'" , , "'Armin Kazmi'" References: <20111125201936.GA26692@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <1322253122.2550.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20111125222211.GA13719@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1322262357.2550.12.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20111126004447.GA14744@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1322280423.10212.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20111127092808.GE21635@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> <4ED2A573.1020807@wolke7.net> <20111127231147.GA1784@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20111129105440.GA2410@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Subject: RE: [bug?] r8169: hangs under heavy load Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:21:08 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcyuhiyHvp6Y1/EVR6qmio0m7OqoygCESGYg In-Reply-To: <20111129105440.GA2410@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@fr.zoreil.com] [...] > > For the 8168c and the later chips, our hardware engineer > says that don't enable > > the RxFIFOOver of IntrMask and don't clear the RxFIFOOver > of IntrStatus. The > > hardware will automatically escape Rx fifo full situation. > Although you try to > > clear the RxFIFOOver of IntrStatus, maybe the bit wouldn't > be cleared. Just > > disregard it. > > Should "later" be understood as gigabit PCI-E only or is > there a similar > difference of behavior between older fast-ethernet PCI-E and > more recent > ones ? > For the fast controller, it should start from rtl8105e. Best Regards, Hayes