From: "Emmanuel Hislen" <hislen@mindspring.com>
To: "Hugo Mills" <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: SiI2112 + Seagate + nFroce2: no DMA!
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:27:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <IEEHKGFDFPBODOHJKGLIKEIJCAAA.hislen@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040120085800.GB31330@carfax.org.uk>
Hi Hugo,
I have re-installed my machine with Fedora Core 1 (thinking a newer version
than RH9 would make the jump to 2.4.24 or 2.6 easier), and this fixed the
DMA issue :-)
Now my SATA drive is running stable in UDMA6.
However, performance is still way below expectations.
I got a huge improvement: my disc read speed (hdparm -t) went from 1.3 to 25
MB/sec.
This is still slower than my PATA drive on my 3 years old AMD 900 PC running
Redhat 9.0 (around 35 MB/sec).
Could you please let me know what you are getting so I know what to expect?
My next step is to try 2.4.24 or 2.6.1 as you suggested, but googling around
a little bit before I do so I found out a few worrying things:
- people have reported a drop in performance on SATA in some 2.6 based
kernel (2.6.0-test9), with reported speeds around 20MB/sec. Apparently there
is no more way to tune max_kb_per_req in 2.6??
- I have found reports that both ide and libdata libraries are limiting
max_kb_per_req to 15 Kb specifically for Seagate drives. So It looks like I
can't even set it to 128 (I did not even try as I saw reports of memory
corruption).
So basically since you've got it to work I'd like to know:
* what speed you get, and what is the RPM of your Seagate
* what is your max_kb_per_req setting (I have 15K)
* what is your accoustic management setting (I have 0)
I could not fix the time on linux so I am sending this mail from WinXP (just
kidding I lost my mails on the linux machine after re-installing :-).
Thanks,
Emmanuel.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Hugo Ranger Mills [mailto:hrm@carfax.org.uk]De la part de Hugo
Mills
Envoye : Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:58 AM
A : manu
Cc : linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Objet : Re: SiI2112 + Seagate + nFroce2: no DMA!
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:55:59PM -0800, manu wrote:
Incidentally, did you know that the date on your computer is very,
very wrong?
> I'm about to give up on my SATA drive as I can't get it to work properly.
> So I thought I may try asking the experts before falling back to PATA.
>
> I have seen many mails reporting the same issue, some of them 6-month old:
>
> - SATA drive comes up in pio mode, not in dma
> - trying to turn on dma with hdparm is a nightmare: I/O errors, crash
> with data corruption... I tried both:
>
> hddarm -d1 /dev/hde
>
> and:
>
> hdparm -u1 -c3 -d1 -X66 /dev/hde
>
> crash in both cases :-((
>
>
> Here's my equipment:
>
>
> ABIT AN7 motherboard (nForce2 chipset, SiI3112 SATA controller)
> AMD Athlon XP 2600+ (+ 512 DDR / 400 MHz)
> SATA HD Seagate Barracuda 160 Gb
>
> The SATA HD is my only drive. The only thing connected to my IDE
> controllers is a DVD/CD combo.
>
> Running Linux Redhat 9.0
> kernel 2.4.20-28.9
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is your problem. There have been a number of bug-fixes to the
SiI drivers since 2.4.20. Try it again with a newer kernel -- such as
2.4.24.
> I've been googling for days now and could not come accross a solution,
> on the contrary I came under the impression that the combination of
> SiI3112 +and Seagate was doomed.
Not so. I have a SiI3112 controller and a 120GiB Seagate drive, and
they work very well together. I'm using 2.6.1, although 2.4.23 also
worked well for me.
[snip]
> Isn't there a solution??
>
> I am willing to try patches of experimental code. At this point I am
> looking at reinstalling everything on a PATA drive anyway, so I have
> nothing to loose.
Try using 2.4.24 or 2.6.1.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- All hope abandon, Ye who press Enter here. ---
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-24 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-01 5:55 manu
2004-01-20 8:58 ` Hugo Mills
2003-01-01 17:06 ` manu
2004-01-24 9:27 ` Emmanuel Hislen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=IEEHKGFDFPBODOHJKGLIKEIJCAAA.hislen@mindspring.com \
--to=hislen@mindspring.com \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®