From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261850AbUCPOUq (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:20:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261844AbUCPOSh (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:18:37 -0500 Received: from law9-f22.law9.hotmail.com ([64.4.9.22]:29189 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261850AbUCPOIp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:08:45 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [202.9.130.118] X-Originating-Email: [pushkaragashe@hotmail.com] From: "vijay agashe" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Active defragmentation : A replacement for bigphysarea? Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:08:30 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2004 14:08:37.0666 (UTC) FILETIME=[2D388020:01C40B60] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have implemented a memory defragmentation utility for linux kernel 2.6 based on the paper by Mr. Daniel Phillips. Can this utility be used instead of bigphysarea patch for requirements less than MAX_ORDER of allocation ? Can the people using bigphysarea patch kindly provide me with their respective memory requirements. Pushkar. _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC from viruses. Get in the experts. http://www.msn.co.in/pcsafety/ Click here now!