From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262911AbVHEP4b (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:56:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262296AbVHEP4R (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:56:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:47566 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262955AbVHEP4F (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:56:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:55:28 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@thoron.boston.redhat.com To: serue@us.ibm.com cc: lkml , Chris Wright , Stephen Smalley , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots In-Reply-To: <20050803164516.GB13691@serge.austin.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20050727181732.GA22483@serge.austin.ibm.com> <20050803164516.GB13691@serge.austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 serue@us.ibm.com wrote: > The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset. > Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc. dbench and tbench were > run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each; results are mean +/- > 95% confidence half-interval. The 'static slot' kernel had a single > static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct > hlist_head security. Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps as secondary module) ? - James -- James Morris