From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com>
To: "zohar@linux.ibm.com" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"graf@amazon.com" <graf@amazon.com>,
"guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com" <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>,
"henry.willard@oracle.com" <henry.willard@oracle.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"jbohac@suse.cz" <jbohac@suse.cz>,
"joel.granados@kernel.org" <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"noodles@fb.com" <noodles@fb.com>,
"paul.x.webb@oracle.com" <paul.x.webb@oracle.com>,
"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"sohil.mehta@intel.com" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com" <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"yifei.l.liu@oracle.com" <yifei.l.liu@oracle.com>,
"harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com"
<harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [SEVERE] Re: [REGRESSION] Linux kernel 6.12.75 fails to compile with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 18:04:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MAUPR01MB11546DC07AF1759DA3DA965ABB87CA@MAUPR01MB11546.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MAUPR01MB11546202F5CB445AC8683A176B87CA@MAUPR01MB11546.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
The faulty commit seems to be f8f73bf0f8a57ee9b86792456bd42079bc98c6b7 on 6.12
> On 4 Mar 2026, at 11:22 PM, Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like kernel 6.12, 6.6 and 6.1 series got only one part of the three patches sent, thus causing this regression.
>
> Marking this as SEVERE, please forgive me if I did wrong.
>
>> On 4 Mar 2026, at 11:05 PM, Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@live.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I found out that Linux kernel 6.12.75 failed to compiled in my automatic builds. The compiler throws the error:
>>
>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c: In function 'ima_get_kexec_buffer':
>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:380:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'ima_validate_range' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 380 | ret = ima_validate_range(ima_kexec_buffer_phys, ima_kexec_buffer_size);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> make[7]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: arch/x86/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
>> make[6]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:466: arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
>> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:466: arch/x86] Error 2
>>
>> Upon searching a bit, I found out that failure of this patch to be backported seems to be main reason:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251231061609.907170-2-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com/
>>
>> Looks like this series itself was not properly backported.
>>
>> I am not sure if any other kernel version is affected. I currently build 6.19 and 6.12 series for my use.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 17:35 Aditya Garg
2026-03-04 17:52 ` [SEVERE] " Aditya Garg
2026-03-04 18:04 ` Aditya Garg [this message]
2026-03-04 19:00 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-04 19:37 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-05 17:40 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-03-05 20:21 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-05 21:57 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-03-06 2:51 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-05 22:06 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-05 22:46 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2026-03-06 0:23 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-06 2:57 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MAUPR01MB11546DC07AF1759DA3DA965ABB87CA@MAUPR01MB11546.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=gargaditya08@live.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=henry.willard@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=paul.x.webb@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yifei.l.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®