mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: why swap at all? (what the user feels)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:04:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEHCMFAA.davids@webmaster.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406012101.40302.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>


> On Tuesday 01 June 2004 20.01, David Schwartz wrote:
> > >  From what I've read previously in this thread, it seems to
> > > me that the
> > > only major problem with swapping that not all users want file system
> > > cache to swap out actual applications (thus making that somewhat aged
> > > mozilla window abit laggy).
> > >
> > > Maybe we could just have a "Allow file system cache to swap out
> > > applications checkbox somewhere"?
> > >
> > > Or, Am I missing something?

> > 	In practice, that would make no difference at all. Once
> > physical memory is
> > full (and it pretty much will always be so), every memory
> request (whether

> No.

	Huh?

> Many people have machines with plenty of RAM (512MB or more is
> pretty much
> standard on new machines), much of which is only used to cache files. The
> file cache is the reason the memory is full.

	Of course. That's why I said, "once physical memory is full (and it pretty
much will always be so)". Physical memory is always full, so every memory
request requires that a page be evicted.

	DS



  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-01 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.fegqf9v.kmidof@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.bqpvcrs.u648jq@ifi.uio.no>
2004-05-27 11:39   ` why swap at all? Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-28 21:37     ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-05-28 22:28       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-05-29  7:31         ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-05-29  8:40           ` MM patches (was Re: why swap at all?) Nick Piggin
2004-05-29  8:46             ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]             ` <200405292014.23559.matt@lpbproductions.com>
2004-05-30  3:31               ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-31 13:13             ` Tvrtko A. Uršulin
2004-05-31 13:33               ` Con Kolivas
2004-05-31 17:34             ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-05-31 10:49         ` why swap at all? jlnance
2004-06-01 11:57           ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-06-01 12:27             ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-06-01 16:49             ` jlnance
2004-06-01 17:38               ` why swap at all? (what the user feels) Martin Olsson
2004-06-01 17:57                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-06-01 18:01                 ` David Schwartz
2004-06-01 19:01                   ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-06-01 19:04                     ` David Schwartz [this message]
2004-06-02 18:38               ` why swap at all? John Hendrikx
2004-06-01 12:21           ` David B. Stevens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAEHCMFAA.davids@webmaster.com \
    --to=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®