From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: recv() hangs until SIGCHLD ?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:48:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKOEDNAFAD.davids@webmaster.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23165e010810100943ua84228cn2faa03a5eb59255@mail.gmail.com>
Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> In some rare cases, one (or several) threads are hanging in recv().
> Both lsof and ls /proc/<pid>/fd show that the socket used is in
> ESTABLISHED mode but when checking on the host on which it's connected
> (a mysql DB) we can't find the corresponding client socket (as it's
> been closed already on the other side).
Blocking sockets will block until data is received. If no other thread is
sending data, this can block forever.
> We are using the Boehm GC which uses the signals SIGXCPU and SIGPWR to
> pause+restart the threads when running a GC cycle. We are correctly
> handling EINTR in send() and recv() by restarting the call in case
> they get interrupted this way.
>
> However, when attaching GDB to our locked thread it seems that even
> when the GC runs, recv() does not exit (the breakpoint after it is not
> reached). If we send SIGCHLD to the hanging thread with GDB, recv()
> does exit and the thread is correctly unlocked. If we don't, it will
> hang forever.
Why shouldn't it hang forever? What was supposed to wake it that's not?
> Any idea how we can stop this from happening or what additional things
> we can check to get more informations on what's occurring ?
You say a thread is hanging in receive and not returning. But you've yet to
explain why it should return. Was it interrupted by a signal? Was data
received? Is the socket non-blocking? Why isn't this expected behavior?
Blocking sockets block, full stop.
DS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-11 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-10 16:43 Nicolas Cannasse
2008-10-11 4:48 ` David Schwartz [this message]
2008-10-11 9:30 ` Samuel Thibault
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-10 13:30 Nicolas Cannasse
2008-10-10 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-11 8:28 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2008-10-11 12:20 ` David Schwartz
2008-10-12 15:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-13 8:31 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2008-10-13 15:02 ` Nicolas Cannasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKOEDNAFAD.davids@webmaster.com \
--to=davids@webmaster.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®