From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S318809AbSHRAxg>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:53:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S318816AbSHRAxg>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:53:36 -0400
Received: from blackbird.intercode.com.au ([203.32.101.10]:5129 "EHLO
	blackbird.intercode.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S318809AbSHRAxg>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:53:36 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:57:06 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@karaya.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
       <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] sigurg/sigio cleanup for 2.5.31
In-Reply-To: <200208171816.g7HIGl611376@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0208181055390.6481-100000@blackbird.intercode.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> Looks like the lock is needed - oh well
> 

It's still lockless in the sigio delivery path, which is where it 
matters.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>