From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263279AbTEOAj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 20:39:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263280AbTEOAj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 20:39:27 -0400 Received: from blackbird.intercode.com.au ([203.32.101.10]:51727 "EHLO blackbird.intercode.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263279AbTEOAjY (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 20:39:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:51:57 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Andrew Morton cc: Ken Ashcraft , Subject: Re: [CHECKER] Passing wrong size to memcpy/memset In-Reply-To: <20030514173351.32c3a4c8.akpm@digeo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2003, Andrew Morton wrote: > Ken Ashcraft wrote: > > > > I'm with the Stanford Metacompilation research group and I wrote a checker > > that looks for places where people use 'sizeof(ptr)' instead of > > 'sizeof(*ptr)' as the length argument to memcpy/memset. > > Well they all look like genuine bugs. It could be that some code is just > performing overly-paranoid memsets. > > I shall submit the below lot unless squeaked at. No squeaks from me. Ken, would you please try and Cc: maintainers for future reports? - James -- James Morris