mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>
To: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Cc: pam.delaney@lsil.com, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compile fix for MPT Fusion driver for 2.5.70 bk
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 02:38:32 +1000 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0306060231390.2807-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030605162901.GA7035@suse.de>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Dave Jones wrote:

>  > diff -urN -X dontdiff bk.pending/drivers/message/fusion/linux_compat.h bk.w1/drivers/message/fusion/linux_compat.h
>  > --- bk.pending/drivers/message/fusion/linux_compat.h	2003-06-06 00:36:11.000000000 +1000
>  > +++ bk.w1/drivers/message/fusion/linux_compat.h	2003-06-06 01:48:49.000000000 +1000
>  > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  /* PCI/driver subsystem { */
>  > -#ifndef pci_for_each_dev
>  > +#ifndef pci_for_each_dev_reverse
>  >  #define pci_for_each_dev(dev)		for((dev)=pci_devices; (dev)!=NULL; (dev)=(dev)->next)
> 
> What has _reverse got to do with this define ?

It was a partner to pci_for_each_dev(), which if not defined, required the 
use of (dev)->next rather than pci_dev_g((dev)->global_list.next.

i.e. it's detecting a version of the PCI API.

It is fairly bogus, yes.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-05 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-05 16:01 James Morris
2003-06-05 16:29 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-05 16:33   ` Greg KH
2003-06-05 16:38   ` James Morris [this message]
2003-06-07 11:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-07 16:07   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Mutt.LNX.4.44.0306060231390.2807-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au \
    --to=jmorris@intercode.com.au \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pam.delaney@lsil.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®