From: "LA Walsh" <law@sgi.com>
To: "lkml" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: writing out disk cache
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:52:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHKEJDCJAA.law@sgi.com> (raw)
Another question that's been bugging me -- this is behavior that seems
identical in 2216/2217 and not related to my ealier performance degredation
post.
I run VMware. It runs w/144Mg and writes out a 153M suspend file when I
suspend it to disk. My system has a total of 512M, so the entire
suspend file gets written to the disk buffers pronto (often under 1 second).
But a 'sync' done afterwards can take anywhere from 20-40 seconds.
vmstat shows a maximum b/o rate of 700, with 200-500 being typical.
So, I know that the maximum write rate through the disk cache is
close to 10,000 blocks/second. So why when the disk cache of a
large file is 'sync'ed out, do I get such low b/o rates?
Two sample 'vmstat 5' outputs during a sync were:
1 0 0 6292 13500 254572 165712 0 0 1 0 119 282 1 1
98
2 0 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 702 279 534 0 2
98
1 1 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 501 352 669 0 1
99
0 1 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 520 372 697 0 2
97
1 0 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 510 367 694 0 2
98
0 1 0 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 694 379 715 0 2
98
1 0 1 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 618 391 964 0 2
98
0 1 1 6292 13444 254572 165716 0 0 0 441 302 765 0 1
98
0 0 0 6292 13496 254572 165716 0 0 0 63 180 355 1 1
99
0 0 0 6292 13496 254572 165716 0 0 0 0 103 195 0 1
99
----and
0 0 0 6228 18836 246036 167824 0 0 0 0 232 563 6 13
82
0 1 0 6228 18784 246036 167824 0 0 0 506 175 489 2 1
97
1 0 0 6228 18780 246036 167824 0 0 0 292 305 647 0 1
99
0 1 0 6228 18780 246036 167824 0 0 0 253 285 602 0 1
99
0 1 0 6228 18780 246036 167824 0 0 0 226 289 612 0 1
99
1 0 0 6228 18832 246036 167824 0 0 0 157 199 406 0 1
99
0 0 0 6228 18832 246036 167824 0 0 0 0 101 240 1 1
99
---
Another oddity -- If you add up the rates in the 2nd example, and multiply
the average rate by 5, you get around 5200 blocks written out (for a 152M
file).
Note that a du on it shows it to use 155352, so it isn't that it is sparse.
Is vmstat an unreliable measure? The above tests were on a 2216 system.
-l
--
L A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
law@sgi.com | Voice/Vmail: (650) 933-5338
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2000-11-13 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-13 21:52 LA Walsh [this message]
2000-11-13 22:53 ` quick question regarding system time Christopher Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHKEJDCJAA.law@sgi.com \
--to=law@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®