From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:18:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:18:45 -0500 Received: from shell.ca.us.webchat.org ([216.152.64.152]:59100 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:18:32 -0500 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Gregory Maxwell" , "Jamie Lokier" Cc: Subject: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:18:31 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010127151428.H6821@xi.linuxpower.cx> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Firewalling should be implemented on the hosts, perhaps with centralized > policy management. In such a situation, there would be no reason to filter > on funny IP options. That's madness. If you have to implement your firewalling on every host, what do you do when someone wants to run a new OS? Forbid it? DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/