mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric Bresie" <ebresie@usa.net>
To: "EvilTypeGuy" <eviltypeguy@qeradiant.com>,
	"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Probing for Kernel Configuration
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:36:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <NDBBIOAPLEFIAKLGABEEIELMENAA.ebresie@usa.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011107140014.K31098@virtucon.warpcore.org>

Yes...doesn't that kind of assume you have all the necessary modules
compiled and available for the kernel you are using??  What I am proposing
is a probe that creates a config for use with compiling the kernel.

That doesn't work when you are trying out a new kernel...If I download linux
2.4.x which has all sorts of new modules...I don't think kudzu will setup
your kernel source configuration options, recompile the modules and then
activate the modules.

Also that is distribution specific also, which is seperate from the kernel
itself..

Eric

> From: Shawn [mailto:drevil@virtucon.warpcore.org]On Behalf Of EvilTypeGuy
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:00 PM
>
> It exists already, it's called kudzu for RedHat, and other things for
other
> systems...At bootup time a redhat system will probe for new hardware using
kudzu
> and then make sure the appropriate modules are loaded if it recognizes the
> hardware...
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 01:32:35PM -0600, Eric Bresie wrote:
> > I just recently installed a new version of Redhat 7.2 and had problems
with
> > some of my devices not being supported as part of the stock
> > installation...this got me thinking...I noticed that when I did a lspci
that a
> > majority of my hardware was identified, but there was no guarantee that
the
> > module to support that hardware is present in the kernel or configured..
> >
> > Is it possible prior to kernel configuration to perhaps have something
like a
> > make newconfig or make probe-config to probe the system and give a guess
as to
> > what modules are needed for a given system...I guess you could think of
it
> > kind of as a plug-n-play for kernel configuration.
> >
> > I could see how this might require some mapping of hardware probed
information
> > to kernel config options which would then enable them (and if
appropriate set
> > to current settings).  And also might require some default utilities
like the
> > pci utilities, the usb utilities, scsi, etc...
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> > Eric Bresie
> > ebresie@usa.net


       reply	other threads:[~2001-11-07 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20011107140014.K31098@virtucon.warpcore.org>
2001-11-07 22:36 ` Eric Bresie [this message]
2001-11-07 19:32 Eric Bresie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=NDBBIOAPLEFIAKLGABEEIELMENAA.ebresie@usa.net \
    --to=ebresie@usa.net \
    --cc=eviltypeguy@qeradiant.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®