From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:48:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:48:13 -0400 Received: from admin.manx.net ([195.10.115.5]:62226 "EHLO mail.manx.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:48:06 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Nigel Bennington" To: Cc: Subject: Broken source file in v2.4.7 sources Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:47:40 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Hi, I hope I've addressed this bug report to the right people... In the sources for v2.4.7, as current yesterday (30/Jun/2001), the file drivers/block/DAC960.c refers to the sem member of a variable defined as being of type IO_Request_T tracking this backwards, it maps to the structure struct request, defined in the file include/linux/blkdev.h this struct does not contain a member sem, although it did in v2.4.3 (the only other kernel sources I have), this means that the DAC960.c file is broken in the 2.4.7 kernel. Hope this helps. p.s. Is 2.4.7 considered a stable release, or should I be looking at something between 2.4.3 and 2.4.7? Thanks in advance, Nigel Bennington.