From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:19:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:18:56 -0400 Received: from oe51.law3.hotmail.com ([209.185.240.219]:47627 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:18:49 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [64.109.172.24] From: "William Scott Lockwood III" To: "Padraig Brady" , "Nerijus Baliunas" Cc: "Alexander Viro" , In-Reply-To: <20010925170129.7AF958F659@mail.delfi.lt> <3BB0B9A7.2010906@antefacto.com> Subject: Re: all files are executable in vfat Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:19:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2001 17:19:10.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[30B44640:01C145E6] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dmask? ----- Original Message ----- > I too used noexec to get around this problem. Is there anyway to get umask > to ignore directories? I.E. (v)fat should always leave directories executable > in my opinion?