From: "Mala Anand" <manand@us.ibm.com>
To: Eric Lemoine <Eric.Lemoine@ens-lyon.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: netperf3 results on 2.5.25 kernel
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:39:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF21DA2F38.45AD0884-ON87256C32.0044DDC0@boulder.ibm.com> (raw)
>> I did a comparison test on 2.4.17, 2.5.25 stock kernels and on 2.5.25
>> with NAPI enabled e1000 driver using netperf3, tcp_stream 1 adapter
>> test using UNI kernels. The test setup/results can be found at:
>>
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf/netperf/results/july_02/netperf2.5.25results.htm
>On which machine(s) do you actually test the kernels? Source machine?
>Destination machine? Or both?
I am just catching up with my mail. Sorry about that. I don't think
I understand your question completely. Let me answer, if I don't make
it clear ask me again.
The client and the server systems have the same level kernels. The CPU
utilization collected at server end is used to derive the throughput
scaled to CPU. The throughput for tcp_stream reflects the rate of
transmits at the client and the rate of receives at the server.
Regards,
Mala
Mala Anand
IBM Linux Technology Center - Kernel Performance
E-mail:manand@us.ibm.com
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/linuxperf
Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-12 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-12 12:39 Mala Anand [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-23 12:56 Mala Anand
2002-08-22 20:28 Mala Anand
2002-08-23 8:50 ` Eric Lemoine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF21DA2F38.45AD0884-ON87256C32.0044DDC0@boulder.ibm.com \
--to=manand@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Eric.Lemoine@ens-lyon.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®