From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:25:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:25:34 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:39396 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:25:33 -0400 Subject: netperf3 results on 2.5.25 kernel To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Mala Anand" Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:28:54 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 08/22/2002 02:28:55 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I did a comparison test on 2.4.17, 2.5.25 stock kernels and on 2.5.25 with NAPI enabled e1000 driver using netperf3, tcp_stream 1 adapter test using UNI kernels. The test setup/results can be found at: http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf/netperf/results/july_02/netperf2.5.25results.htm Regards, Mala Mala Anand IBM Linux Technology Center - Kernel Performance E-mail:manand@us.ibm.com http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/linuxperf Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088