From: "Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:55:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF81A861D7.0F84A7BA-ONC1256BD0.0072344C@de.ibm.com> (raw)
David Mosberger wrote:
>Just a minor nit: for ia64 it's either 32KB (for page sizes up to
>16KB) or 64KB (for 64KB page size). The 32KB is conservative and
>based on the assumption that there can be up to 16 nested interrupts
>plus some other nested traps (such as unaligned faults). A separate
>irq stack should let us reduce the per-task stack size.
So in the case of 8K page size, you need an order-2 allocation
for the stack, right? How do you handle failures due to fragmentation?
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
Linux for S/390 Design & Development
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 --- Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-06 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-06 20:55 Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2002-06-06 21:19 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-06 22:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-07 0:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
[not found] <OF70FD985F.A9C66B00-ONC1256BD0.0069C993@de.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-06-06 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-06 20:27 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-07 11:28 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-06 19:24 Ulrich Weigand
[not found] <mailman.1023370621.16639.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-06-06 17:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-06-07 1:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-06 13:32 Ulrich Weigand
[not found] <20020604225539.F9111@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206050820100.2941-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020605144357.A4697@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-06-05 20:40 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-05 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 2:55 Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 15:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 18:43 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 21:07 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 22:15 ` Steve Lord
2002-06-05 22:31 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 23:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-06 0:24 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-06 1:15 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-02 15:52 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-09 18:50 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-06 1:42 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-06 2:30 ` Stephen Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF81A861D7.0F84A7BA-ONC1256BD0.0072344C@de.ibm.com \
--to=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®