From: "Mala Anand" <manand@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: akpm@us.ibm.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, Mala Anand <manand@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: efficient copy_to_user and copy_from_user routines in Linux Kernel
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:50:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF89BA678E.7BBDA367-ON85256BE6.00403732@raleigh.ibm.com> (raw)
>Mala Anand wrote:
>>
>> Here is a 2.5.19 patch that improves the performance of IA32
copy_to_user
>> and copy_from_user routines used by :
>>
>> (1) tcpip protocol stack
>> (2) file systems
>>
>This came up about a year back when zerocopy networking was merged.
>Intel boxes started running more slowly purely because of the 8+8
>alignment thing.
>I changed tcp to use a different copy if either source or dest were
>not eight-byte aligned, and found that the resulting improvement
>across a mixed networking load was only 1%. Your numbers are higher,
>so perhaps there are different alignments in the mix...
I will test on other workloads when I return back to work after OLS
and vacation. However we tested an earlier version of this patch on
Netbench using sendfile and gained around 3% improvement. The baseline
profiling showed that Netbench was spending 10% in generic_copy_to_user.
The tcp options are aligned on an 4-byte boundary, so depending on the
options used the address to the data (source address to the
generic_copy_to_user) should fall on an 4 or 8 byte boundary. I agree
with you more test is needed.
>One question: have you tested on other CPU types? This problem is
>very specific to Intel hardware. On AMD, the eight-byte alignement
>artifact does not exist at all. It could be that your patch is not
>desirable on such CPUs?
I tested only Pentium II and III. I will test it on Pentium IV.
When I said 8-byte alignment, it is 8 and greater. I will
try to check out AMD also.
Regards,
Mala
Mala Anand
E-mail:manand@us.ibm.com
Linux Technology Center - Performance
Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088
Andrew Morton
<akpm@zip.com.au> To: Mala Anand/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm@us.ibm.com lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: efficient copy_to_user and copy_from_user routines in Linux Kernel
06/25/2002 12:03
PM
-
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-28 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-28 11:50 Mala Anand [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-28 12:35 Mala Anand
2002-06-24 19:34 Mala Anand
2002-06-24 19:33 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-25 17:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-25 17:43 ` kuznet
2002-06-25 19:47 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-25 21:46 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-26 13:54 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF89BA678E.7BBDA367-ON85256BE6.00403732@raleigh.ibm.com \
--to=manand@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®