mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul McKenney" <Paul.McKenney@us.ibm.com>
To: nigel@nrg.org
Cc: ak@suse.de, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar.sarma@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Suparna Bhattacharya <bsuparna@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:08:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OFC444FA4A.28BB0BC6-ON88256A2B.0016B71E@LocalDomain> (raw)


> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Paul McKenney wrote:
> > The algorithms we have been looking at need to have absolute guarantees
> > that earlier activity has completed.  The most straightforward way to
> > guarantee this is to have the critical-section activity run with
preemption
> > disabled.  Most of these code segments either take out locks or run
> > with interrupts disabled anyway, so there is little or no degradation
of
> > latency in this case.  In fact, in many cases, latency would actually
be
> > improved due to removal of explicit locking primitives.
> >
> > I believe that one of the issues that pushes in this direction is the
> > discovery that "synchronize_kernel()" could not be a nop in a UP kernel
> > unless the read-side critical sections disable preemption (either in
> > the natural course of events, or artificially if need be).  Andi or
> > Rusty can correct me if I missed something in the previous exchange...
> >
> > The read-side code segments are almost always quite short, and, again,
> > they would almost always otherwise need to be protected by a lock of
> > some sort, which would disable preemption in any event.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Disabling preemption is a possible solution if the critical section is
short
> - less than 100us - otherwise preemption latencies become a problem.

Seems like a reasonable restriction.  Of course, this same limit applies
to locks and interrupt disabling, right?

> The implementation of synchronize_kernel() that Rusty and I discussed
> earlier in this thread would work in other cases, such as module
> unloading, where there was a concern that it was not practical to have
> any sort of lock in the read-side code path and the write side was not
> time critical.

True, but only if the synchronize_kernel() implementation is applied to UP
kernels, also.

                    Thanx, Paul

> Nigel Gamble                                    nigel@nrg.org
> Mountain View, CA, USA.                         http://www.nrg.org/
>
> MontaVista Software                             nigel@mvista.com


             reply	other threads:[~2001-04-11  4:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-11  4:08 Paul McKenney [this message]
2001-04-11  5:22 ` yodaiken
2001-04-11  8:37   ` Nigel Gamble
2001-04-11  8:19 ` Nigel Gamble
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-22 13:38 Paul McKenney
2001-04-10 22:08 Paul McKenney
2001-04-10 23:49 ` Nigel Gamble
2001-04-09 12:46 bsuparna
2001-04-09 23:28 ` Nigel Gamble
2001-04-07 23:59 Paul McKenney
2001-04-07 23:54 Paul McKenney
2001-04-10 15:21 ` Rusty Russell
2001-04-07  1:25 Paul McKenney
2001-04-07 21:25 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OFC444FA4A.28BB0BC6-ON88256A2B.0016B71E@LocalDomain \
    --to=paul.mckenney@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=bsuparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar.sarma@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®