From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261915AbREPNHw>; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:07:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261916AbREPNHm>; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:07:42 -0400
Received: from [38.138.154.253] ([38.138.154.253]:11525 "EHLO
	HQNotes1.storage.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261915AbREPNH0>; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:07:26 -0400
From: "Jalajadevi Ganapathy" <JGanapathy@storage.com>
Subject: Re: kernel2.2 to kernel2.4!!
To: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7  March 21, 2001
Message-ID: <OFD4CF85ED.0821790C-ON85256A4E.0047FC30@storage.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:06:55 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on HQNotes1/Storage(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at
 05/16/2001 09:06:56 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


So, Is there any alternative. Archives sez not to use mdelay.