From: Ramses <ramses@well-founded.dev>
To: Netdev Bot+sashiko <netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org>
Cc: Jv <jv@jvosburgh.net>, Andrew+netdev <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Davem <davem@davemloft.net>, Kuba <kuba@kernel.org>,
Pabeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jbohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
Edumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Razor <razor@blackwall.org>, Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] bonding: give a slave that starts UP a full arp_missed_max window
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 15:47:07 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <P5CGmHQ--F-9@well-founded.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179336101737.3134.5509394527190638689@kernel.org>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this fix still miss the case where the ARP monitor starts some time
> after enslavement?
Yes. As the review notes, the old seed behaved the same way there, so
this is not a regression. v5 narrows the commit message to a slave
enslaved while the ARP monitor is running. Reseeding when the monitor
starts later will be a separate follow-up, see my reply on patch 1.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 11:48 [PATCH net v4 0/2] bonding: fix the initial last_rx seed for the ARP monitor Ramses de Norre via B4 Relay
2026-10-28 11:48 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] bonding: fix initial last_rx vs ARP-monitor slack window Ramses de Norre via B4 Relay
2026-10-30 2:59 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-10-30 11:50 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-30 14:46 ` Ramses
2026-10-28 11:48 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] bonding: give a slave that starts UP a full arp_missed_max window Ramses de Norre via B4 Relay
2026-10-30 11:50 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-30 14:47 ` Ramses [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=P5CGmHQ--F-9@well-founded.dev \
--to=ramses@well-founded.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®