From: "Dave Paris" <dparis@w3works.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <rspchan@starhub.net.sg>
Subject: RE: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:04:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PLEIIGNDLGEDDKABPLHBAECPCHAA.dparis@w3works.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0401300939070.15830-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
Has this been demonstrated on *any* system/arch using GCC 3.2.3 (or other
3.2 series) or is it limited in scope to the description below? Does it
seem to do this with other implementations (other than sha256.c) or other
kernels? Just trying to get an idea if this is a complier optimization bug
or something much more limited in scope.
My personal lab is currently being unboxed and I won't be able to run my own
tests for another week or so. (apologies in advance)
In any case, this is *extremely* serious from a number of angles.
Kind Regards,
-dsp
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of James Morris
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 9:40 AM
To: R CHAN
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; David S. Miller
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch
pentium3,4
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, R CHAN wrote:
> 2.6.2-rc2 sha256.c is miscompiled with gcc 3.2.3.
> (User space is RedHat 3ES.)
>
> Just an observation:
>
> gcc 3.2.3 is miscompiling sha256.c when using
> -O2 -march=pentium3
> or pentium4.
>
> gcc 3.3.x is ok, or the problem disappears
> if I use arch=i686 or reduce the optimisation level to -O2.
>
> Sympthoms are all the sha256 test vectors fail.
> If I extract the guts of the file to compile in user space
> the same problem occurs.
Have you noticed if this happens for any of the other crypto algorithms?
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-30 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-30 3:21 R CHAN
2004-01-30 14:39 ` James Morris
2004-01-30 15:04 ` Dave Paris [this message]
2004-01-30 15:24 ` R Chan
2004-01-30 15:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-30 16:35 ` James Morris
2004-01-30 17:14 ` Andy Isaacson
2004-01-30 19:49 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-02-01 21:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-30 21:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-01 21:18 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-01 23:22 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-02 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-02 18:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-30 17:26 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-01-30 15:43 Arnd Bergmann
2004-01-30 16:57 ` James Morris
2004-01-30 18:02 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-30 18:35 ` James Morris
2004-01-30 18:53 ` James Morris
2004-02-02 4:08 linux
2004-02-05 19:40 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PLEIIGNDLGEDDKABPLHBAECPCHAA.dparis@w3works.com \
--to=dparis@w3works.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rspchan@starhub.net.sg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®