From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Bogdan Costescu <bogdan.costescu@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:14:08 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0106011006220.10502-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106011521440.18082-100000@kenzo.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
Jeff, Thanks for copying netdev. Wish more people would do that.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > The loss and regain of link status should be proactively signalled to
> > userspace using netlink or something similar.
>
> [ For the general discussion ]
> I fully agree, but I just wanted to give an example of legit use from
> user space of _current_ values from hardware.
>
> > Currently we have
> > netif_carrier_{on,off,ok} but it is only passively checked.
> > netif_carrier_{on,off} should probably schedule_task() to fire off a
> > netlink message...
>
> [ Link status details ]
> Just that not all NICs have hardware support (and/or not all drivers use
> these facilities) for link status change notification using interrupts.
> Right now, most drivers _poll_ for media status and based on the poll
> rate, netif_carrier routines are (or should be) called. We can't make the
> poll rate very small for the general case, as MII access is time
> consuming (same discussion was some months ago when the bonding driver
> was updated). However, for users who know that they need this info to be
> more accurate (at the expense of CPU time), polling through ioctl's is the
> only solution.
Not really.
One idea i have been toying with is to maintain hysteris or threshold of
some form in dev_watchdog;
example: if watchdog timer expires threshold times, you declare the link
dead and send netif_carrier_off netlink message.
On recovery, you send netif_carrier_on
Assumption:
If the tx path is blocked, more than likely the link is down.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-01 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.991383180.28261.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-01 2:47 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for real this time) Tim Hockin
2001-06-01 8:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-01 8:46 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for real this Alan Cox
2001-06-01 8:58 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for real this time) Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-01 12:03 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-01 12:20 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis time) Jeff Garzik
2001-06-01 12:51 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis Alan Cox
2001-06-01 12:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-01 12:58 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-01 13:06 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-01 13:15 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis Jeff Garzik
2001-06-01 13:39 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-01 14:14 ` jamal [this message]
2001-06-01 14:30 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-02 14:49 ` jamal
2001-06-03 12:09 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-04 18:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-04 19:08 ` jamal
2001-06-01 13:19 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-01 14:02 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-01 14:19 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for Alan Cox
2001-06-01 14:37 ` Mark Frazer
2001-06-01 14:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-01 14:45 ` Mark Frazer
2001-06-01 14:46 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-01 17:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-02 8:20 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-02 16:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-02 19:10 ` MII access (was [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems) Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-02 19:25 ` MII access (was [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) Alan Cox
2001-06-02 21:36 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-02 21:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-03 11:59 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-03 12:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-05 9:07 ` Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-10 2:07 ` eepro100 security fix [was: Re: MII access] Andrey Savochkin
2001-06-01 15:13 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for Bogdan Costescu
2001-06-02 22:04 ` [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (for realthis Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.30.0106011006220.10502-100000@shell.cyberus.ca \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bogdan.costescu@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®