From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270093AbTG1PBw (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270190AbTG1PBw (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:52 -0400 Received: from math.ut.ee ([193.40.5.125]:43659 "EHLO math.ut.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270093AbTG1PBv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:01:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:17:00 +0300 (EEST) From: Meelis Roos To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: raid5 autoselecting a slower checksum function Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is 2.6.0-test2 on a Celeron 900: raid5: measuring checksumming speed 8regs : 1640.000 MB/sec 8regs_prefetch: 1316.000 MB/sec 32regs : 824.000 MB/sec 32regs_prefetch: 788.000 MB/sec pIII_sse : 1744.000 MB/sec pII_mmx : 2244.000 MB/sec p5_mmx : 2400.000 MB/sec raid5: using function: pIII_sse (1744.000 MB/sec) Why doesn't it select p5_mmx if it is 37% faster than pIII_sse? -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)