From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262033AbTJDN3a (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2003 09:29:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262034AbTJDN3a (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2003 09:29:30 -0400 Received: from math.ut.ee ([193.40.5.125]:4024 "EHLO math.ut.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262033AbTJDN33 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Oct 2003 09:29:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:29:23 +0300 (EEST) From: Meelis Roos To: Jes Sorensen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: qla1280 & __flush_cache_all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Meelis> So why is qla1280 in 2.6-current using __flush_cache_all? > > The driver is calling flush_cache_all() not __flush_cache_all(), the > __ thing is an architecture specific issue. > > Yes it's a lazy approach left over from the old codebase. Yes, it's flush_cache_all() that's causing problems. Current sparc64 doesn't even have flush_cache_all anymore. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)