From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263003AbTDFOxa (for ); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:53:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263009AbTDFOxa (for ); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:53:30 -0400 Received: from wall.ttu.ee ([193.40.254.238]:8966 "EHLO wall.ttu.ee") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263003AbTDFOxa (for ); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:53:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:04:43 +0300 (EET DST) From: Siim Vahtre To: Trond Myklebust cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nfs issues In-Reply-To: <16016.16757.380048.996214@charged.uio.no> Message-ID: References: <16016.16757.380048.996214@charged.uio.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Tough. 2.5.x is a development kernel, and yes, there are still bugs > and issues to be tracked down. > If you need stability use 2.4.x Nah, I'm fine with 2.5. The benefits are too big to be whiny about few little bugs ;-)