From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262603AbTL2D6I (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:58:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262610AbTL2D6I (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:58:08 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:44037 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262603AbTL2D6F (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:58:05 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:56:14 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Mike Fedyk cc: akmiller@nzol.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ide: "lost interrupt" with 2.6.0 In-Reply-To: <20031229035533.GG1882@matchmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dupli-Disk requires taskfile access and will correctly operate. Accusys is total CRAP, unless they licensed the technology proper. Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 07:37:37PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > I know the FSM's are wrong because I fixed them for Dupli-Disk. > > How they operate, I can not disclose. But Accusys can not handle correct > > settings for FSM to Taskfile. > > Does that mean that if you use taskfile on Dupli-Disk controllers that they > will fail, and that disabling taskfile access might help (is that still an > option in 2.6?) >