mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hemment <markhe@veritas.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Linus elevator
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 18:13:53 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012181750350.22851-100000@alloc> (raw)

Hi,

  Looking at the second loop in elevator_linus_merge(), it is possible for
requests to have their elevator_sequence go negative.  This can cause a
v long latency before the request is finally serviced.

  Say, for example, a request (in the queue) is jumped in the first loop
in elevator_linus_merge() as "cmd != rw", even though its 
elevator_sequence is zero.  If it is found that the new request will
merge, the walking back over requests which were jumped makes no test for
an already zeroed elevator_sequence.  Hence it zero values can occur.

  With high default values for read/wite_latency, this hardly ever occurs.

  A simple fix for this is to test for zero before decrementing (patch
below) in the second loop.
  Alternatively, should testing in the first loop be modified?

Mark


diff -u --recursive --new-file -X dontdiff linux-2.4.0-test12/drivers/block/elevator.c markhe-2.4.0-test12/drivers/block/elevator.c
--- linux-2.4.0-test12/drivers/block/elevator.c	Tue Dec  5 23:05:26 2000
+++ markhe-2.4.0-test12/drivers/block/elevator.c	Mon Dec 18 17:50:19 2000
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@
 	if (ret != ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE && *req) {
 		while ((entry = entry->next) != &q->queue_head) {
 			struct request *tmp = blkdev_entry_to_request(entry);
+
+			if (!tmp->elevator_sequence)
+				continue;
 			tmp->elevator_sequence--;
 		}
 	}

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-12-18 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-18 18:13 Mark Hemment [this message]
2000-12-18 18:40 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0012181750350.22851-100000@alloc \
    --to=markhe@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®