mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hemment <markhe@veritas.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, eric@andante.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Possible SCSI + block-layer bugs
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:07:13 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103311505130.4246-200000@alloc> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2412 bytes --]

Hi,

  I've never seen these trigger, but they look theoretically possible.

  When processing the completion of a SCSI request in a bottom-half,
__scsi_end_request() can find all the buffers associated with the request
haven't been completed (ie. leftovers).

  One question is; can this ever happen?
  If it can't then the code should be removed from __scsi_end_request(),
if it can happen then there appears to be a few problems;

  The request is re-queued to the block layer via 
scsi_queue_next_request(), which uses the "special" pointer in the request
structure to remember the Scsi_Cmnd associated with the request.  The SCSI
request function is then called, but doesn't guarantee to immediately
process the re-queued request even though it was added at the head (say,
the queue has become plugged).  This can trigger two possible bugs.

  The first is that __scsi_end_request() doesn't decrement the
hard_nr_sectors count in the request.  As the request is back on the
queue, it is possible for newly arriving buffer-heads to merge with the
heads already hanging off the request.  This merging uses the
hard_nr_sectors when calculating both the merged hard_nr_sectors and
nr_sectors counts.
  As the request is at the head, only back-merging can occur, but if
__scsi_end_request() triggers another uncompleted request to be re-queued,
it is possible to get front merging as well.

  The merging of a re-queued request looks safe, except for the
hard_nr_sectors.  This patch corrects the hard_nr_sectors accounting.


  The second bug is from request merging in attempt_merge().

  For a re-queued request, the request structure is the one embedded in
the Scsi_Cmnd (which is a copy of the request taken in the 
scsi_request_fn).
  In attempt_merge(), q->merge_requests_fn() is called to see the requests
are allowed to merge.  __scsi_merge_requests_fn() checks number of
segments, etc, but doesn't check if one of the requests is a re-queued one
(ie. no test against ->special).
  This can lead to attempt_merge() releasing the embedded request
structure (which, as an extract copy, has the ->q set, so to
blkdev_release_request() it looks like a request which originated from
the block layer).  This isn't too healthy.

  The fix here is to add a check in __scsi_merge_requests_fn() to check
for ->special being non-NULL.

  The attached patch is against 2.4.3.

  Jens, Eric, anyone, comments?

Mark

[-- Attachment #2: scsi.patch --]
[-- Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1359 bytes --]

diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c markhe-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- linux-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c	Sat Mar  3 02:38:39 2001
+++ markhe-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c	Sat Mar 31 16:56:31 2001
@@ -377,12 +377,15 @@
 			nsect = bh->b_size >> 9;
 			blk_finished_io(nsect);
 			req->bh = bh->b_reqnext;
-			req->nr_sectors -= nsect;
-			req->sector += nsect;
 			bh->b_reqnext = NULL;
 			sectors -= nsect;
 			bh->b_end_io(bh, uptodate);
 			if ((bh = req->bh) != NULL) {
+				req->hard_sector += nsect;
+				req->hard_nr_sectors -= nsect;
+				req->sector += nsect;
+				req->nr_sectors -= nsect;
+
 				req->current_nr_sectors = bh->b_size >> 9;
 				if (req->nr_sectors < req->current_nr_sectors) {
 					req->nr_sectors = req->current_nr_sectors;
diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c markhe-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c
--- linux-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c	Fri Feb  9 19:30:23 2001
+++ markhe-2.4.3/drivers/scsi/scsi_merge.c	Sat Mar 31 16:38:27 2001
@@ -597,6 +597,13 @@
 	Scsi_Device *SDpnt;
 	struct Scsi_Host *SHpnt;
 
+	/*
+	 * First check if the either of the requests are re-queued
+	 * requests.  Can't merge them if they are.
+	 */
+	if (req->special || next->special)
+		return 0;
+
 	SDpnt = (Scsi_Device *) q->queuedata;
 	SHpnt = SDpnt->host;

                 reply	other threads:[~2001-03-31 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0103311505130.4246-200000@alloc \
    --to=markhe@veritas.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=eric@andante.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®