From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Rick Jones <raj@cup.hp.COM>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]]
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:50:42 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101181547580.24913-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200101182030.XAA08626@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Actually, TUX-1.1 (Ingo, do I not lie, did you not kill this code?)
> does this. It does not ack quickly, when complete request is received
> and still not answered, so that all the redundant acks disappear.
(it's TUX 2.0 meanwhile), and yes, TUX uses it. We speculatively delay ACK
of parsed input packet in the hope of merging it with the first output
packet. If the output frame does not happen for 200 msecs then we send a
standalone ACK to be RFC-conform. This way TUX can do single-packet web
replies for small requests. (well, plus SYN-ACK and FIN-ACK)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-18 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3A65E825.FFEB194@cup.hp.com>
2001-01-17 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-17 20:03 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-17 20:38 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-17 20:57 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-18 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 14:57 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-18 18:24 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-19 2:46 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-19 3:03 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-19 19:07 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-19 20:03 ` kuznet
2001-01-19 21:20 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-20 18:03 ` kuznet
2001-01-22 18:44 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-20 14:56 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-01-23 7:20 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-20 23:09 ` Lincoln Dale
2001-01-20 23:27 ` James Sutherland
2001-01-21 0:02 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-01-18 12:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-25 17:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-01-17 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-17 22:17 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-17 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-17 22:44 ` Jonathan Walther
2001-01-18 13:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-18 17:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 17:49 ` Zach Brown
2001-01-19 3:16 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-19 3:56 ` David Ford
2001-01-18 18:29 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-18 18:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-18 19:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-18 20:11 ` kuznet
2001-01-18 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 21:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 20:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 20:37 ` kuznet
2001-01-18 21:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 0:27 ` Olivier Galibert
2001-01-19 0:59 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-19 17:52 ` kuznet
2001-01-19 20:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 20:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 21:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 21:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 22:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 22:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-19 15:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 18:18 ` kuznet
2001-01-19 21:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-20 17:28 ` kuznet
2001-01-20 18:14 ` Abramo Bagnara
2001-01-20 18:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-20 19:05 ` kuznet
2001-01-20 19:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-20 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-20 20:22 ` kuznet
2001-01-20 21:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-20 20:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-21 18:37 ` kuznet
2001-01-20 19:39 ` kuznet
2001-01-20 21:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-20 21:31 ` Guus Sliepen
2001-01-18 22:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 19:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-18 19:59 ` kuznet
2001-01-18 20:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-19 3:25 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-19 3:35 ` dean gaudet
2001-01-18 9:34 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-18 18:20 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-18 19:45 ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-18 20:30 ` kuznet
2001-01-18 20:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2001-01-18 22:49 ` Rick Jones
2001-01-18 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-18 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-18 17:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-17 21:51 Dan Kegel
2001-01-24 0:19 Cacophonix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0101181547580.24913-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raj@cup.hp.COM \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®