mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.1-ac UP-APIC updates
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:00:53 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102201556510.7613-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E14VJoa-0000f1-00@the-village.bc.nu>


On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > i dont like this one. 100 times a second makes absolutely no performance
> > difference whatsoever - but eg. i'm driving kernel profiling from the NMI
> > handler to get profiles of eg. IRQ handlers and other cli()-ed code areas.
>
> So set it to 100Hz as a debugging option like slab debugging

my major gripe right now is that we still have bug reports that say that
systems hang when using nmi_watchdog=1 and work if nmi_watchdog=0.
Changing the NMI watchdog to be 1 Hz will make these bugreports "Linux
hangs once a week" instead of a "Linux hangs after 1-2 hours", which is
clearly hiding things and making debugging harder.

(and driving kernel-profiling from the NMI interrupt is a short-term
patch, so there is just no point in going to 1 Hz right now just to go
back to 100 Hz a few days later.)

the rest of the changes are excellent - it's only the 100 Hz NMI issue i
have a problem with.

	Ingo


  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-20 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-20 18:11 Mikael Pettersson
2001-02-20 18:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-02-20 20:55   ` Alan Cox
2001-02-20 21:00     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2001-02-21  0:36 Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.32.0102201556510.7613-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®