From: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] #ifdef __cplusplus removal (fwd)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:42:58 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201101541390.7586-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201102139390.9236-100000@wotan.suse.de>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> > And again for my bad email aliases :)
> > This patch removes the "#ifdef __cplusplus" from within a "#ifdef
> > __KERNEL__" in linux/string.h. It really isn't needed AFACIT. It was
> > put
> > in for 1.1.0, which was before __KERNEL__ appeared. Alan told me to
> > send it to you.
>
> A quick grep shows __cplusplus is used in quite a few places in the kernel
> source. I'm wondering if various developers are running their code through
> g++ to maybe pick up on warnings that gcc doesn't see.
That was the only one I saw in include/linux that was inside __KERNEL__ .
I didn't look in include/asm* carefully, but grep found some __cplusplus
code there as well.
--
Peter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-10 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-10 20:27 Peter Jones
2002-01-10 20:41 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-10 20:42 ` Peter Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0201101541390.7586-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®