mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Koch <haegar@sdinet.de>
To: "Randal, Phil" <prandal@herefordshire.gov.uk>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel (E-mail)" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH-RFC] README 1ST - New problem logging macros (2.5.38)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:15:42 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209241613330.7015-100000@space.comunit.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0EBC45FCABFC95428EBFC3A51B368C9501AF48@jessica.herefordshire.gov.uk>

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Randal, Phil wrote:

> You'll have to ask RedHat et al why they persist in backporting
> security patches to "old" releases of Apache (etc) instead of
> releasing the new versions.  The effect is the same, with
> vulnerabilities being squashed, but the version numbers reported
> suggesting otherwise.

Because every new version gives you some new problems/incompatibilities,
which must not happen in a running production-environment.

And testing every security-update 4 weeks in the lab before putting
it into production would be worse.

c'ya
sven

-- 

The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around it.
(John Gilmore on http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/)


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-24 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-24 14:04 Randal, Phil
2002-09-24 14:15 ` Sven Koch [this message]
2002-09-26 15:43 ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-24  4:56 Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  4:49 Larry Kessler
2002-09-24 12:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24 13:59   ` Gerhard Mack
2002-09-24 22:38     ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-24  1:55 Larry Kessler
2002-09-24  2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  5:55   ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-24  6:11     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  6:58       ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-24  5:15 ` Greg KH
2002-09-24  5:28   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-26 18:56   ` Larry Kessler
2002-09-26 19:38     ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-26 20:01       ` Larry Kessler
2002-09-26 18:41         ` Rob Landley
2002-09-24  5:58 ` Greg KH
2002-09-24 16:32   ` Patrick Mochel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0209241613330.7015-100000@space.comunit.de \
    --to=haegar@sdinet.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prandal@herefordshire.gov.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®