From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262593AbSJBUID>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:08:03 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262592AbSJBUIC>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:08:02 -0400
Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:55058 "EHLO
	smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262593AbSJBUIC>; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:08:02 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 22:13:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: roman@serv
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
cc: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: a problem report
In-Reply-To: <20021002213600.A2017@mars.ravnborg.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210022208410.8911-100000@serv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> The 2.5.39 version of Roman's lkc looked really good IMHO, but I think
> more people has to get into the discussion before it will be accepted.

I'd be happy about a discussion, but if it's not happening soon, it's up
to Linus to accept it.

bye, Roman