From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263399AbSJGVSb>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:18:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263400AbSJGVSb>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:18:31 -0400
Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:61708 "EHLO
	smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263399AbSJGVSb>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:18:31 -0400
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 23:23:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: roman@serv
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
cc: pavel@ucw.cz, <bcollins@debian.org>, <lm@bitmover.com>,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software
In-Reply-To: <20021007.114936.51301887.davem@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210072317150.8911-100000@serv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote:

>    (as it stands you want $5000 for any bk-using developer inside
>    RedHat and SuSE).
>
> Stop spreading crap and fud.  I, and nobody else at Red Hat, give or
> need to give Larry one dime to use BK for kernel work.

Actually RedHat does support subversion development, so RedHat must have
some special agreement with BM, so you can legally use BK for free.

bye, Roman