mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mansfield <lkml@dm.cobite.com>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] silence an unnescessary raid5 debugging message
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:36:57 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210091330300.29237-100000@admin> (raw)


>LVM manages to trigger the "raid5: switching cache buffer size" printk 
>quiet voluminously when using a snapshot device.  The following patch 
>disables it by placing it under the debugging PRINTK macro.

Ben (and Ingo),

I happen to hit this message thousands of times per second sometimes under
normal operation in certain loads (raw devices for oracle and fs on LVM on
raid5).  I understand that it's annoying, I actually think it shouldn't be
removed, because it's telling the operator importantn information.

As I understand it, the message is indicating a really bad performance 
problem (i.e a complete flush of the stripe cache), and that anyone 
encountering it on a very frequent (i.e. annoying) basis should consider 
changing their setup.

Encountering this message has forced us to plan to split the single raid5 
we have into two, in order to satisfy the different request sizes of the 
raw-device vs. the ext3 fs.

David

P.S.  Is there any hope of fixing this issue so that the stripe cache can 
handle different sized requests?  Possibly is this a bug in LVM?

-- 
/==============================\
| David Mansfield              |
| david@cobite.com             |
\==============================/


             reply	other threads:[~2002-10-09 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-09 17:36 David Mansfield [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-08 22:03 Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-08 23:31 ` Neil Brown
2002-10-08 23:36   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-09  0:51     ` David S. Miller
2002-10-09  1:02       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-09 11:55         ` jw schultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0210091330300.29237-100000@admin \
    --to=lkml@dm.cobite.com \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®