From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Brad Chapman <jabiru_croc@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LinuxKernelConf: does it apply to 2.4 kernels?
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:51:03 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210232347480.8911-100000@serv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021023211334.12597.qmail@web40009.mail.yahoo.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Brad Chapman wrote:
> Does the new LinuxKernelConf configuration system by Roman Zippel apply to
> 2.4-based kernel trees, or only to 2.5-based kernel trees?
Theoretically it's no big problem, it needs a bit of manual work.
> Also, are there any plans to merge it?
No, 2.6 is more important. Should there be huge demand for a backport,
it's not really a problem, but I doubt it will happen.
bye, Roman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 21:13 Brad Chapman
2002-10-23 21:51 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0210232347480.8911-100000@serv \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jabiru_croc@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®