From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Nero <neroz@iinet.net.au>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:59:49 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211030052410.13258-100000@serv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211030943.13730.neroz@iinet.net.au>
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Nero wrote:
> OR, we could use the logical choice. GTK+ is on most systems, has hardly any
> dependancies, is relatively small (compared to Qt) and doesn't require a C++
> compiler. Really, I think the only people being religious here are the ones
> voting for Qt, as it just doesn't make sense to use it for such a thing.
Show me the source and we can continue this discussion. Right now qconf is
included as replacement for the old xconfig. It shouldn't take to much
effort to package it seperately. As soon as someone is interested in doing
this for a distribtion I'll add the few missing bits.
bye, Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-02 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-25 22:21 Romain Lievin
2002-11-02 7:03 ` Nero
2002-11-02 20:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-11-02 17:00 ` Jon Portnoy
2002-11-02 22:19 ` bert hubert
2002-11-02 19:45 ` Nero
2002-11-02 20:42 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-11-02 21:12 ` David B. Stevens
2002-11-02 21:07 ` Russell King
2002-11-02 22:43 ` Marek Habersack
2002-11-02 22:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-02 21:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-02 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-02 21:57 ` Patrick Finnegan
2002-11-02 22:06 ` Russell King
2002-11-02 22:33 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-02 22:34 ` Russell King
2002-11-03 3:18 ` Gerhard Mack
2002-11-02 22:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-02 23:03 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-02 22:56 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-02 23:07 ` Patrick Finnegan
2002-11-03 4:07 ` Matthew D. Pitts
2002-11-04 4:57 ` Stefan Traby
2002-11-04 6:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-02 23:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-11-02 22:43 ` Nero
2002-11-02 23:59 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2002-11-03 0:06 ` J.A. Magallón
2002-11-02 23:16 ` Nero
2002-11-03 1:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-03 3:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03 9:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-03 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03 4:42 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-11-03 0:07 ` Patrick Finnegan
2002-11-03 3:53 ` George Staikos
2002-11-03 9:08 ` Nero
2002-11-06 0:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-06 1:25 ` Mariusz Zielinski
2002-11-03 1:15 ` Rando Christensen
2002-10-31 13:43 Where's the documentation for Kconfig? Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-31 14:43 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-01 12:52 ` Russell King
2002-11-01 13:50 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-01 19:31 ` Russell King
2002-11-01 20:35 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] ` <20020625221306.GA439@free.fr>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211021254420.6949-100000@serv>
2002-11-02 13:20 ` Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk+) Romain Lievin
2002-11-02 14:45 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0211030052410.13258-100000@serv \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gilbertd@treblig.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neroz@iinet.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®