From: Jon Portnoy <portnoy@tellink.net>
To: archaios <quack@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:24:03 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211200022360.21801-100000@cerberus.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002301c2905f$ec818800$0100000a@r1a4n3>
Blatantly false. Have you even _read_ the GPL? It doesn't seem that way -
in which case why are you discussing it?
Please get your facts straight. While you're at it, please avoid making
yourself look like an idiot in the future.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, archaios wrote:
> When you GPL a piece of software, you sign over your rights to the FSF. Therefore, there is very little that can be done about this;
> from a legal perspective, the FSF _itself_ determines what is and what isn't construed as a derived work.
>
> - David McIlwraith
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ross Vandegrift <ross@willow.seitz.com>
> To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:59:26AM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-20 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-19 22:09 Jeff Garzik
2002-11-20 1:52 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-20 2:48 ` Josh Myer
2002-11-20 2:59 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-20 4:26 ` Ross Vandegrift
2002-11-20 6:41 ` archaios
2002-11-20 5:01 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 5:24 ` Jon Portnoy [this message]
2002-11-20 5:47 ` GPL rant -- was: " Zac Hansen
2002-11-20 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 18:57 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 19:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-11-20 19:32 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 19:33 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 19:11 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 18:57 ` Thomas Langås
2002-11-20 19:15 ` Dana Lacoste
2002-11-20 18:32 ` nick
2002-11-20 19:50 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 19:16 ` nick
2002-11-21 2:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-21 5:10 ` TAINTED (Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules) Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 2:49 ` spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules David McIlwraith
2002-11-20 3:06 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-20 8:12 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-20 10:17 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-11-20 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 14:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-11-20 18:54 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 19:31 ` Cort Dougan
2002-11-20 19:40 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 19:44 ` Cort Dougan
2002-11-20 19:55 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 20:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 20:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-11-20 21:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 22:03 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 22:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-20 22:15 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 22:43 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-20 22:17 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 22:36 ` Larry McVoy
2002-11-20 23:16 ` Eli Carter
2002-11-20 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-20 20:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-11-20 18:25 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-21 10:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-11-21 13:08 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-21 17:02 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-21 17:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-11-22 6:19 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-22 0:00 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 4:12 ` Some like it HOT! (Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules) Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 6:21 ` spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules Andre Hedrick
2002-11-20 7:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2002-11-20 3:03 David McIlwraith
2002-11-20 6:31 Samium Gromoff
2002-11-20 8:27 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-20 19:09 Nicholas Berry
[not found] <fa.fglehrv.95g32b@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.h7et98v.hjm1of@ifi.uio.no>
2002-11-21 0:03 ` Russ Allbery
[not found] <fa.onsrmsv.1g08thi@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ni4tkev.3ge008@ifi.uio.no>
2002-11-21 9:05 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-11-21 16:54 Herman Oosthuysen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0211200022360.21801-100000@cerberus.localhost \
--to=portnoy@tellink.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quack@bigpond.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®