From: David Mansfield <lkml@dm.cobite.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@imladris.surriel.com>,
Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Subject: oom killer and its superior braindamage in 2.4
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:06:09 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302231058070.23778-100000@admin> (raw)
Marc, Rik,
> - Feb 21 10:04:57 codeman kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 2657
> (apache).
>
> The above log entry (apache) appeared for about 4 hours every some
> seconds (same PID) until I thought about sysrq-b to get out of this
> braindead behaviour. The machine was somewhat dead for me because I was
> not able to do anything but sysrq. The system itself was _not_ dead,
> there was massive disk i/o. This is 2.4.20 vanilla.
This exact thing happened to me as well, on a 2.4.20-pre that hasn't been
upgraded to 2.4.20 yet. The thing that concerns me most is:
Why won't the system kill the process it claims to be killing?
If, in Marc's case, the system wants to kill PID 2657, a lowly sleeping
apache process, why can't it? This is a bug for sure.
For me, there was some python process chosen as the one for killing and it
repeated the 'Out of Memory: Killed process xxxxx (python)' for hours
while making no progress. The machine was still routing packets but I
couldn't log in. Sys-rq was disabled, so I was forced to use the big red
button.
Rik, any ideas?
David
--
/==============================\
| David Mansfield |
| lkml@dm.cobite.com |
\==============================/
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-23 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-23 16:06 David Mansfield [this message]
2003-02-23 16:25 ` Faik Uygur
2003-02-23 16:25 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 18:07 ` David Mansfield
2003-02-23 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 20:22 ` David Mansfield
2003-02-23 20:53 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-24 9:13 Mikael Starvik
2003-02-24 9:27 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-22 19:35 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-22 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-22 20:32 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 17:35 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-23 20:18 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 20:29 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0302231058070.23778-100000@admin \
--to=lkml@dm.cobite.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=riel@imladris.surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®