mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mansfield <lkml@dm.cobite.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@imladris.surriel.com>,
	Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Subject: oom killer and its superior braindamage in 2.4
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:06:09 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302231058070.23778-100000@admin> (raw)


Marc, Rik,

> - Feb 21 10:04:57 codeman kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 2657 
> (apache).
>
> The above log entry (apache) appeared for about 4 hours every some 
> seconds (same PID) until I thought about sysrq-b to get out of this 
> braindead behaviour. The machine was somewhat dead for me because I was 
> not able to do anything but sysrq. The system itself was _not_ dead, 
> there was massive disk i/o. This is 2.4.20 vanilla.

This exact thing happened to me as well, on a 2.4.20-pre that hasn't been 
upgraded to 2.4.20 yet.  The thing that concerns me most is:

Why won't the system kill the process it claims to be killing?

If, in Marc's case, the system wants to kill PID 2657, a lowly sleeping 
apache process, why can't it?  This is a bug for sure.

For me, there was some python process chosen as the one for killing and it 
repeated the 'Out of Memory: Killed process xxxxx (python)' for hours 
while making no progress.  The machine was still routing packets but I 
couldn't log in.  Sys-rq was disabled, so I was forced to use the big red 
button.

Rik, any ideas?

David

-- 
/==============================\
| David Mansfield              |
| lkml@dm.cobite.com           |
\==============================/


             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-23 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-23 16:06 David Mansfield [this message]
2003-02-23 16:25 ` Faik Uygur
2003-02-23 16:25 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 18:07   ` David Mansfield
2003-02-23 20:14     ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 20:22       ` David Mansfield
2003-02-23 20:53         ` Rik van Riel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-24  9:13 Mikael Starvik
2003-02-24  9:27 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-22 19:35 Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-22 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-22 20:32   ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 17:35     ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-23 20:18       ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-23 20:29         ` Marc-Christian Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0302231058070.23778-100000@admin \
    --to=lkml@dm.cobite.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
    --cc=riel@imladris.surriel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®