From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new system call mknod64
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 01:49:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304220057080.5042-100000@serv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304211117260.3101-100000@home.transmeta.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Not anymore for blockdevices. And now that Al's back not anymore soon
> > for charater devices, too :)
>
> Actually, we still do it for both block _and_ character devices.
>
> Look at "nfs*xdr.c" to see what's up.
This is actually a good example to show how problematic the major/minor
split is. It depends very much on the nfs server which bits you actually
get back and it requires some guessing from the client side which bits it
can use. A linux-2.2 server will happilly truncate that value to 16 bit,
BSD will give you a 8:24 value back.
It's very unlikely that you can use a 64bit dev_t reliably with nfs in the
foreseeable future.
bye, Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-21 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-20 21:26 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-20 21:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-20 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 11:59 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-21 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-21 18:21 ` viro
2003-04-21 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:27 ` viro
2003-04-21 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:54 ` viro
2003-04-21 19:16 ` Jörn Engel
2003-04-21 18:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-21 18:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-21 18:58 ` viro
2003-04-21 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 19:35 ` viro
2003-04-21 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 18:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 23:49 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
[not found] <20030421215009$2052@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030421231010$7ee3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030422000016$17e3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030422083014$0fe2@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-04-22 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-22 1:02 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-22 1:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-22 2:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-22 2:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-22 6:00 ` jw schultz
2003-04-22 17:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 21:48 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-21 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-21 21:43 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-21 23:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 23:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-04-22 8:24 ` Shachar Shemesh
2003-04-20 22:12 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-21 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-20 20:34 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-20 21:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-20 18:39 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-20 18:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0304220057080.5042-100000@serv \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®