From: Krishna Akella <akellak@onid.orst.edu>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:48:23 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312172144030.31026-100000@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312171951030.5789@home.osdl.org>
Truly amazing job!!! Bravo!!!
--
Krishna Akella
-----------------------------------------------------------------
They cannot break our spirit, for we do not care if they like us. They
cannot run us out of business, for it is our passion not our livelihood.
They cannot deceive us, because it is in the open. They cannot lie about
us, for we hide nothing. They cannot fight us, for we are legion...
--Courpus_Callosum. On Open Software.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> "The beaver is out of detox"
> - Anon
>
> This should not be a big surprise to anybody on the list any more, since
> we've been building up to it for a long time now, and for the last few
> weeks I haven't accepted any patches except for what amounts to fairly
> obvious one-liners.
> To give you an example, one of the nastier bugs that we chased for the
> last five weeks was a bug that could only be reproduced reliably on a
> 16- or 32-way system, and only when the system had flaky disks. Putting in
> known-good disks made the problem disappear. Similarly, compiling the
> kernel with another compiler made the problem disappear.
>
> It turned out to be a really subtle bug wrt SMP ordering and stack
> allocation, and lots of thanks to Ram Pai for gathering all the
> information that eventually led to it being fixed. The fix was a one-liner
> and a big comment - but my point is that the quality of bugs has been
> pretty high lately, and we feel that we're in pretty good shape.
>
> Linus
>
> ---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-18 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-18 4:14 Linus Torvalds
2003-12-18 4:50 ` Jonathan Brown
2003-12-18 5:00 ` Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
2003-12-18 5:05 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-12-18 5:07 ` Norberto Bensa
2003-12-18 5:15 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-18 5:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-18 5:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-12-18 6:14 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-18 6:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-12-18 9:12 ` ismail 'cartman' dönmez
2003-12-18 9:34 ` Greg KH
2003-12-18 9:48 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 9:59 ` Matt H.
2003-12-18 10:19 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-18 11:00 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 10:43 ` Hans Reiser
2003-12-18 11:03 ` reiser4 in 2.6 was " Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 11:42 ` Hans Reiser
2003-12-19 17:58 ` E. Gryaznova
2003-12-18 16:17 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-18 19:31 ` Hans Reiser
2003-12-18 19:42 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-18 22:48 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-12-19 3:42 ` Hans Reiser
2003-12-19 6:57 ` Jens Axboe
2003-12-18 9:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-12-18 13:43 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-12-18 16:22 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-18 21:02 ` List of mailing lists (was Re: Linux 2.6.0) Rob Landley
2003-12-18 14:21 ` Linux 2.6.0 Michael Hunold
2003-12-18 19:45 ` MD Raid fixed? was: " Mike Fedyk
2003-12-18 21:49 ` Neil Brown
2003-12-18 5:48 ` Krishna Akella [this message]
2003-12-18 7:16 ` Gabor MICSKO
2003-12-18 7:25 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2003-12-18 9:56 ` Andrew Walrond
2003-12-18 10:20 ` Carlos Jiménez
2003-12-18 12:34 ` iain d broadfoot
2003-12-19 2:18 ` Diskstats inconsistancy between 2.4.23 & 2.6 was: " Mike Fedyk
2003-12-19 2:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-19 3:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-18 5:24 Shawn Starr
2003-12-18 18:12 (->surya<-)
2003-12-18 23:16 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-12-19 0:31 ` Martin Diehl
2003-12-19 1:01 ` Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0312172144030.31026-100000@shell \
--to=akellak@onid.orst.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®