From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265525AbUBAWmy (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:42:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265532AbUBAWmy (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:42:54 -0500 Received: from kiuru.kpnet.fi ([193.184.122.21]:64234 "EHLO kiuru.kpnet.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265525AbUBAWmw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:42:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 00:42:48 +0200 (EET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_H=E4stbacka?= X-X-Sender: midian@midi To: David Weinehall cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Uptime counter In-Reply-To: <20040201221900.GE15492@khan.acc.umu.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, David Weinehall wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:07:40AM +0200, Markus Hästbacka wrote: [..snip..] > > Well, since most of the changes in the latest kernels involve > networking, trying it with various different network-adapters would be > interesting, and stress-testing the network-code in general. > > If you have the hardware or a really good confidence, a recent > 2.2-kernel to compare with and sufficient knowledge of C, have a look at > the network-drivers for a2065 and ariadne, both of which lack the > padding-fixes the other adapters have, since I didn't want to touch that > mess... > I don't have that hardware to test on, but I can stress test it tomorrow, give the box a _high_ load, and that way help testing. Thanks for the suggestions. Markus