From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265540AbUBAW7c (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:59:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265549AbUBAW7c (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:59:32 -0500 Received: from kiuru.kpnet.fi ([193.184.122.21]:18155 "EHLO kiuru.kpnet.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265540AbUBAW7b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:59:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 00:59:26 +0200 (EET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_H=E4stbacka?= X-X-Sender: midian@midi To: Paul Jakma cc: Christian Borntraeger , Subject: Re: Uptime counter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Paul Jakma wrote: > > 2.0? 2.2 has been out more than long enough for boxes running such > kernels to have rolled over several times already. > Well, not for boxen with 2.0.40-rc8 (Check release date @ kernel.org and be suprised :-) > security: if the box concerned is heavily firewalled and partitioned > away from rest of internet, whats the problem? :) > Nah, it's a webserver! Markus