From: Stephan van Hienen <raid@a2000.nu>
To: Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
tbm@a2000.nu
Subject: Re: fsck out of memory
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:28:40 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302101226530.7274@ddx.a2000.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15942.46375.478902.665549@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Peter Chubb wrote:
> Is there any reason why you're sticking with the 2.4 kernel and ext3?
> XFS has been used (on SGI systems) for much longer with large disk
> arrays, and I'd expect (linux-specific bugs aside) it to be a more
> mature product for this application.
i used ext2/3 on all my servers
never checked out xfs or reiserfs, so don't really want to check it out an
an important server, but if it's better to switch to something else..... ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-10 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-07 15:17 kernel
2003-02-07 17:07 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-07 17:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-02-09 10:08 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-09 10:32 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-09 20:08 ` Peter Chubb
2003-02-10 11:28 ` Stephan van Hienen [this message]
2003-02-09 20:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-02-10 12:01 ` Stephan van Hienen
[not found] ` <3E479CC7.B170D5C7@aitel.hist.no>
2003-02-11 16:14 ` Re:2TB+ fs ext3 (was fsck out of memory) Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-10 22:44 ` [Ext2-devel] Re: fsck out of memory Stephen C. Tweedie
2003-02-11 13:11 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-11 14:33 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <1044993857.6640.7.camel@plokta.s8.com>
2003-02-11 20:32 ` Re:2TB+ fs ext3 (was fsck out of memory) Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-07 17:24 ` fsck out of memory Andreas Dilger
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0302071637050.11484-100000@nooks.wimpunk.com>
2003-02-07 15:50 ` kernel
2003-02-07 16:09 ` Wim Vinckier
2003-02-07 16:15 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-07 16:20 ` Wim Vinckier
2003-02-07 17:08 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-02-11 2:53 Marco C. Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0302101226530.7274@ddx.a2000.nu \
--to=raid@a2000.nu \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@chubb.wattle.id.au \
--cc=tbm@a2000.nu \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®