From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262690AbTDEWMT (for ); Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:12:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262692AbTDEWMT (for ); Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:12:19 -0500 Received: from node181b.a2000.nl ([62.108.24.27]:31120 "EHLO ddx.a2000.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262690AbTDEWMS (for ); Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:12:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 00:24:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Stephan van Hienen To: Andre Hedrick cc: Mark Hahn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: onboard ICH4 seen as ICH3 (ultra100 controller onboard) (2.4.20/2.4.21-pre7) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > NO, since they all use the same timings there is no problem. > Intel never made an Ultra 133, and all the timings from PIIX forward build > on each other. i didn't say anything about u133 ? (hdparm -x69 = udma5/u100 ?) > > There is no bug, except in your BIOS maybe. in my bios i didn't select any drives (i thought linux was just bypassing bios for disk access ?) so why can't i use u100 with the onboard controller ? (which is an u100 controller)