From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261500AbTD2CBs (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:01:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261506AbTD2CBs (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:01:48 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:62093 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261500AbTD2CBr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:01:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:18:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Richard B. Johnson" X-X-Sender: root@chaos Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: Steven Cole cc: rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: more for spelchkrs In-Reply-To: <1051581546.22143.32.camel@spc> Message-ID: References: <1051581546.22143.32.camel@spc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Steven Cole wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > >linux-2.5.68-current... > > > >init/main.c: mispelled :) > > > >net/*: apropriate; unparsable; sepciafied; > > I don't know what's wrong with "unparsable", but there are quite a few > other spelling glitches in net/*. The last line of Methinks the only 'spell-check-able' word for this is: non-interpretable In many cases, the correct negative is 'non-' rather than 'un'. Unfortunately, parsable, parseable, etc., are not (yet) words so they can't be negated with 'non-'. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.