mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ghugh Song <ghugh@bellini.mit.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Something wrong with recent 2.4.21-rc* kernels?
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 14:15:16 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305311354230.2743@bellini.mit.edu> (raw)

I am comparing

2.4.21-pre3-ac4
2.4.21-rc5-ac1
2.4.21-rc6-ac1

In the last two kernels, something is definitely not right.
LaTeXing a big file takes about twice the time compared to
the same job under 2.4.21-pre3-ac4.
However, I am not totally satisfied with the 2.4.21-pre3-ac4, either.
In the beginning just after a reboot, the condition is really nice.
However, after a while, "time"ing a job reveals that something bad is
happening in the first column of "real" time, which means the wall-clock
timing.  One might say that it is still better with 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
than the situation with 2.4.21-rc5-ac1 or with 2.4.21-rc6-ac1, because
it still does not contaminate "user" time in the middle column.

With 2.4.21-pre3-ac4, as everyone comlained, there seems to be a
problem with the cursor movement while kernel-compilation in the back.
The mouse movement seemed to have improved in 2.4.21-rc6-ac1.  But
overall performance hit is just not acceptable.

BTW, the .config file for 2.4.21-rc6-ac1 has been taken from
2.4.21-pre3-ac4 during compilation.

The motherboard is an Asus with the Nvidia2 chipset.
Main system is running off SCSI hard disks under Adaptec U2-SCSI PCI
controller.  No ATAPI hard disk is running at the moment.
I never used the installed ATAPI CDrom during the test.

In the emaillist, I have been reading about random halts in recent
kernels, i.e., 2.4.21-rc*.  Well. I did not experience such a
drastic things. maybe because I did not wait long enough.

Regards,

G. Hugh Song




             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-31 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-31 18:15 ghugh Song [this message]
2003-05-31 18:56 ` More on Blade 100/AC97 codec detection failure J.C. Wren
2003-05-31 20:00 Something wrong with recent 2.4.21-rc* kernels? ghugh Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0305311354230.2743@bellini.mit.edu \
    --to=ghugh@bellini.mit.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®