From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262695AbTJPEWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:22:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262705AbTJPEWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:22:35 -0400 Received: from modemcable137.219-201-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.201.219.137]:40833 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262695AbTJPEWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:22:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:22:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6] constant_test_bit doesn't like my gcc In-Reply-To: <20031015212134.41a427d3.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20031015211012.5daac8fc.akpm@osdl.org> <20031015212134.41a427d3.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Andrew Morton wrote: > > static __inline__ int constant_test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long * addr) > > { > > - return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (((const volatile unsigned int *) addr)[nr >> 5])) != 0; > > + return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (addr[nr >> 5])) != 0; > > } > > > > Looks fine. Does your compiler get this right? Yep, thanks.